Loading…
Loading grant details…
| Funder | Export-Import Bank of China (China Eximbank) |
|---|---|
| Recipient Organization | Government of Uganda |
| Country | Uganda |
| Start Date | Mar 31, 2015 |
| End Date | Nov 08, 2027 |
| Duration | 4,605 days |
| Number of Grantees | 1 |
| Roles | Recipient |
| Data Source | AidData Chinese Aid |
| Grant ID | 59753 |
China Eximbank provides RMB 1.26 billion loan for Phase 1 of Entebbe International Airport Upgrading and Expansion Project On March 31, 2015, the Chinese Government and the Government of Uganda signed a preferential loan framework agreement for Phase 1 of the Entebbe International Airport Upgrading and Expansion Project.
On the same day, China Eximbank and the Government of Uganda, represented by the Ministry of Finance, Planning, and Economic Development (MoFPED), signed an RMB 1,260,000,000 government concessional loan (GCL) loan agreement [CHINA EXIMBANK GCL NO. (2015) 6 TOTAL NO. (545)] for Phase 1 of the Entebbe International Airport Upgrading and Expansion Project.
Uganda’s Parliament then ratified the loan agreement on July 29, 2015.
Several months later, on November 17, 2015, MoFPED entered into a subsidiary, on-lending agreement with Uganda Civil Aviation Authority (UCAA). China Eximbank issued the loan's notice of effectiveness on December 17, 2015.
The first scheduled loan repayment date is April 1, 2022.
The GCL is collateralized against (1) a minimum cash balance in a USD-denominated repayment reserve (escrow) account, and (2) project revenues (cash proceeds from the rehabilitation of Entebbe International Airport) deposited in a UGX-denominated sales collection (escrow) account.
A December 3, 2015 escrow account agreement between MoFPED, Stanbic Bank Uganda Limited, UCAA, and China Eximbank specifies that the borrower must maintain a minimum cash balance in the repayment reserve account of RMB 25,200,000 during the loan’s grace period (equivalent to total payable interest for one year during the loan’s grace period) and RMB 98,870,000 during the loan’s repayment period (equivalent to total payable principal and interest for one year during the loan’s repayment period).
The cash balance of the repayment reserve account was $4 million (UGX 15 billion) as of February 2019.
The GCL agreement also specifies that the 'all the revenues (proceeds) of Entebbe International Airport (including but not limited to revenues generated from the Project) shall be applied in priority to payment of any and all amounts due and payable [to the lender].' Under the terms of an Escrow Account Agreement, UCAA also agreed to (a) seek secure advance approval from China Eximbank for any use of the airport revenues that it deposits in the escrow account; and (b) grant China Eximbank approval authority over the airport’s annual budgets.
The ultimate borrower/end-user (UCAA) is expected to use the GCL proceeds to finance a $200,000,000 commercial (EPC) contract between UCAA and China Communications Construction Company (CCCC), which was signed on October 8, 2014 and amended on January 12, 2015.
According to the Government of Uganda’s Aid Management Platform (AMP), this loan achieved a 78% disbursement rate, with China Eximbank making 26 loan disbursements (worth $156,639,169.44) between 2015 and 2021: a $60,124,334.71 disbursement on December 24, 2015, a $9,822,292.39 disbursement on November 15, 2016, a $4,473,339.53 disbursement on December 14, 2016, a $5,272,753.02 disbursement on March 29, 2017, a $2,363,019.84 disbursement on April 20, 2017, a $1,336,370.91 disbursement on May 25, 2017, a $1,237,900.78 disbursement on August 10, 2017, a $5,492,164.36 disbursement on November 21, 2017, a $3,445,536.22 disbursement on December 27, 2017, a $21,668,252.97 disbursement on April 19, 2019, a $3,032,693.76 disbursement on May 30, 2019, a $3,743,156.53 disbursement on August 22, 2019, a $3,074,851.76 disbursement on October 31, 2019, a $2,911,749.34 disbursement on November 25, 2019, a $2,683,403.29 disbursement on March 31, 2020, a $1,275,590.33 disbursement on April 27, 2020, a $3,197,241.55 disbursement on May 27, 2020, a $1,758,890.15 disbursement on July 24, 2020, a $1,831,735.75 disbursement on August 7, 2020, a $1,944,401.91 disbursement on September 28, 2020, a $3,835,965.97 disbursement on December 18, 2020, a $4,414,162.60 disbursement on November 24, 2021, a $3,128,465.91 disbursement on March 30, 2022, a $2,110,577.92 disbursement on August 17, 2022, a $1,314,054.62 disbursement on November 17, 2022, and a $1,146,263.31 disbursement on December 13, 2022.
According to MoFPED's Report on Public Debt, Grants, Guarantees and Other Financial Liabilities for Financial Year 2021/2022, as of December 31, 2021, total loan disbursements amounted to $155,982,698.23 and the loan’s amount outstanding (including arrears) was $155,982,698.23. The purpose of the project’s first phase is to upgrade and expand Entebbe International Airport.
The airport is located at 5 minutes from the main campus of Kampala International University, near the town of Entebbe, on the shores of Lake Victoria, and approximately 40.5 kilometers (25 mi) by road south-west of the central business district of Kampala, the capital and largest city of Uganda. Its exact locational coordinates are 00°02′41″N 032°26′35″E”.
Phase 1 activities include constructing a new cargo terminal, resurfacing the main runway with new lighting, constructing a new terminal building (that is adjacent and connected to the existing terminal and with aerobridges), repairing, strengthening and expanding the main apron serving the existing terminal and the new terminal, repairing the second runway and associated taxiways, repairing Apron 2 (which serves VVIPs or Very Very Important Persons), strengthening Apron 4 (which serves general aviation and cargo aircraft), replacing aging navigation aids, and constructing a multi-story car park.
The total cost of Phase 1 is $200 million and the total cost of Phase 2 is $125 million. These two phases were originally expected to take 5-years to implement.
It is expected that, upon completion, the expanded and upgraded airport will increase annual passenger output at the airport from 1.5 million to 3.5 million and freight volume of the completed freight center from 55,000 tons to 100,000 tons CCCC is the contractor responsible for project implementation.
Dar Al-Handasah (Shair & Partners) is responsible for project supervision. A formal groundbreaking ceremony took place on August 29, 2015. Construction began on May 10, 2016. As of June 2019, the project had achieved a 52% completion rate.
As of October 26, 2021, the Government of Uganda’s Aid Management Platform summarized the status of the project in the following manner: ‘Physical Progress: The overall performance of the civil works currently stands at 50%.
One runway is complete; works on the runway apron are halfway and 80% of the works on the cargo building have been achieved.
Challenges: Overdue IPC Payments which have led to accrual of interest charges e.g accrued interest for [Interim Payment Certificate] #1 up to [Interim Payment Certificate] #23 as of July 11th 2019 stood at USD 951,368.49. This increases by the month.
Progress of the Cargo Terminal and Airfield Works continues but require intense supervision to ensure acceptable workmanship and approved materials are employed.
Some [overdue] approved materials for the Cargo Complex are not yet delivered to [the project site], meaning that delays encountered so far will not be recovered.
The project still reports approximately Eleven Months delay and the Contractor [CCCC] is still reluctant to [reprogram its] work in accordance with Clause 8.3 of the General Conditions of Contract, to include measures intended to recover lost time. It is also evident that project completion cannot be achieved by May 2021.
In addition, challenges for construction include coordination difficulties with the extensive fuel network (by Tristar) and with Airport Operations, Safety and Security, due to the naturally intrusive nature of construction within an operational environment. Runway 17/35 and Apron 1 Works are particularly noted in this respect.
The project has further caused environmental concerns due to its implementation taking place within nationally protected areas of Uganda. By November 2021, the project had achieved an overall completion rate or 75.1%. Then, in March 2022, construction of the cargo terminal was completed.
Li Qinpu, a project manager of the CCCC, said at the peak of the construction of the cargo terminal, the project employed 80 Chinese workers and more than 900 local workers at different skills levels. Phase 1 was originally expected to reach completion by May 9, 2021. However, this date was subsequently pushed out to December 5, 2022.
The expected completion date of the project’s second phase (which had not yet secured financing as of March 2022) is March 2024.
The Entebbe International Airport Upgrading and Expansion Project has become a source of local and international controversy. One set of concerns relate to the potentially inflated cost of the underlying commercial contract. CCCC (the EPC contractor) pre-financed the feasibility study for the design and implementation of project.
The feasibility study report submitted to CAA in December 2013 costed Phase 1 of the project at $200,000,000, which paved the way for the signing of a $200,000,000 commercial contract between CAA and CCCC on October 2014.
There was, however, no independent review of the feasibility estimates by UCAA during the procurement stage which would have informed the Government of Uganda on the reasonableness and accuracy of the cost estimates prior to agreeing to CCCC securing the funds from China Eximbank.
Additionally, the UCAA contracts committee approved the project cost in the feasibility study on September 23, 2014 without undertaking an independent evaluation of these costs.
Another set of concerns relate to the collateralization arrangement that underpins the China Eximbank loan agreement and an Escrow Account Agreement in which UCAA reportedly granted China Eximbank approval authority over the Entebbe International Airport’s annual budgets and UCAA’s use of revenues from the airport in the escrow account.
The loan agreement states that repayment of the China Eximbank loan is the responsibility of the “end user” (CAA) and the escrow account (established as a requirement of the loan agreement to facilitate repayment) should be funded using airport revenues.
However, in January 2019, Uganda’s Auditor General revealed that the Government of Uganda’s Ministry of Finance, Planning, and Economic Development had made interest payments on the loan and but not deposited airport revenues in the escrow account.
The Auditor General also noted that “inconsistencies in the operationalization of the agreements and the involved parties’ deemed actions represent non-compliance/ breach of contract that could result in penalties and even cancellation of the [loan] facility.” By March 2019, China Eximbank responded to the borrower’s non-compliance with escrow account conditions by halting loan disbursements, which in turn led to the Government of Uganda falling behind on payments to CCCC (the EPC contractor).
This resulted in major construction delays.
CCCC’s payment certificates 11-23 (worth $24.5 million) for work performed between December 2017 and February 2019 were not paid, which led to a project implementation standstill that lasted for 361 days.
UCAA later told a parliamentary oversight body that “[t]hese [escrow account] conditions were not palatable for an international airport of a sovereign state whose operations are dynamic and sometimes unpredictable.” The Government of Uganda responded on March 6, 2019 by dispatching an 11-member delegation (consisting of CAA officials, Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development officials, the Deputy Solicitor General, and Uganda’s Ambassador to China, H.E.
Dr. Crispus C.W. Kiyonga) to Beijing to renegotiate so-called ‘toxic clauses’ in the loan agreement with China Eximbank.
According to an internal Government of Uganda record (a September 5, 2019 memo/letter from Finance Minister Matia Kasaija to Public Works Minister Monica Azuba Ntege), “[w]hile the initial agenda was to cause a re-negotiation of specific clauses in the original financing agreement that seemed very unsuitable to [the Government of Uganda] and therefore to the end user (UCAA), the [China Eximbank] officials made it clear from the onset that re-negotiation and amendment of the loan agreement were not agreeable to them.
The Bank proposed, which the [Government of Uganda delegation] found plausible, that rather than having a re-negotiation, we could have a ‘clarification’ of the contentious clauses with a view of having a workable interpretation.
It was the understanding of all parties that to achieve a win-win situation, the contentious clauses would be interpreted with a view of having a balanced effect that would enable resumption of disbursement without necessarily amending the agreement.
The Bank’s view was that such an amendment if allowed would set a bad precedent and more so, they saw no cause to warrant the amendment.
In that regard, it was agreed that: i) The Bank resumes financing through disbursements and makes flexible the conditions set around the Escrow Account Agreement clauses especially the provision requiring UCAA to deposit all airport revenues [in] this account.
The Bank clarified that the objective of the sales collection account was to see [UCAA’s] inflows and outflows for this account and that since the minimum reserve amount was already available on the debt reserve payment account, the funds would henceforth be available for [UCAA’s] operations.
It was agreed that the Borrower [the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development] shares proof of the banking on the sales collection account as a trigger for the Bank to unlock disbursements.
This has since been implemented. ii) Another contentious matter that the delegation wanted to be varied was the provision requiring UCAA to submit for approval all their operational budgets to [China Eximbank].
The Bank clarified that they were interested in the project budget but since this budget was subsumed in other UCAA operational activities, UCAA was henceforth required to share approved budgets with the Bank for review only and not for approval.” China Eximbank and the Government of Uganda delegation also reportedly agreed to keep the details of their meeting (‘minutes of the meeting’) confidential.
Then, on December 20, 2019, Uganda’s Office of the Auditor General publish a report that criticized Uganda’s Ministry of Finance for the borrowing terms in the Entebbe airport loan agreement and several other loan agreements with China Eximbank: “A review of the various facility agreements for issued [China Eximbank] loans revealed that the [Government of Uganda] was obliged to open escrow accounts where the government was expected to make advance deposit of funds over the tenure of the loan required for the repayment of the loan.
It was observed that some of the escrow bank accounts are held with local commercial banks while others are held in the Lenders countries. […] The funds are deposited on commercial bank accounts upfront and the creditors have access to them before even the loans are disbursed. Government of Uganda has no control over these accounts.
The practice causes financial strain to the cash flows of the country and maybe as a result of weaknesses in negotiations that are undertaken by the government of Uganda and the lenders.
These funds could have been used as advance to start the implementation of the projects for which the financing is required. The practice distorts the Government [of Uganda]s] cash flows and monetary control policy.
The [Government of Uganda’s] Accounting Officer promised to improve on the way [the Government] negotiate[s] loans with escrow conditionalities. [Uganda’s Auditor General] advised the Accounting [Officer] to in future avoid loans with such unfavourable terms or negotiate to have such terms softened.” Then, in October 2021, a parliamentary panel led by opposition politicians revealed that the Government of Uganda’s arrangement with China Eximbank requires that all of UCAA’s revenues and expenditures pass through accounts controlled by China Eximbank at a Kampala branch of South Africa’s Standard Bank Group Ltd. (Stanbic Bank), which is itself partly owned by Beijing’s biggest state-owned bank, the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC).
Members of Parliament’s Committee on Commissions, Statutory Authorities and State Enterprise (Cosase) raised questions and concerns about the wisdom of granting financial oversight power (and influence over which creditors get paid first) — normally reserved for the country’s treasury and parliament — to a Chinese state-owned bank.
They also questioned the wisdom of the Ugandan Government limiting its own ability to tap into revenue from rapidly expanding tourism and exports. [Note: Entebbe International Airport is a regional hub airport.
Traffic has soared over the past decade and is expected to grow more amid a $15 billion crude-oil development project along Uganda’s border with the Democratic Republic of Congo.] Joel Ssenyonyi, a member of parliament who led the panel, said “It’s appalling. […] that [China Eximbank] now has to approve any budget spending [of UCAA].” On October 28, 2021, Uganda's Finance Minister Matia Kasaija was called before the parliamentary panel and questioned over the terms of the loan.
He apologized to the lawmakers, noting that “we shouldn’t have accepted some of the clauses. [...] But they told you . . . either you take it or leave it.” He also said the loan would be repaid and there was no chance that the airport would be seized by the lender.
Then, on November 25, 2021, a local newspaper in Uganda (The Daily Monitor) published a report, which suggested that the China Eximbank loan agreement “if not amended, [could] expose Uganda's sovereign assets to attachments and take-over upon arbitration awards in Beijing.” Two days later, on November 27, 2021, UCAA Spokesperson Vianney M Luggya tweeted that “It is true that @UgandaCAA opened up a Sales Collection Account in @stanbicug where all the [UCAA’s] revenues are deposited in line with the Escrow Account Agreement terms, but it does not mean that anyone is to control our finances.” Luggya also tweeted that “The [UCAA] enjoys the freedom & liberty of spending what is collected (as per the budget).
The lender’s monitoring of the account is only similar to what happens when one gets a salary loan or any other loan, & the bank requests that the salary is channeled through their bank.
It does not mean that lending bank takes over your salary.” In late 2021, internal disagreements within the executive branch of the Ugandan Government also spilled into public view.
Uganda's Finance Minister Matia Kasaija reportedly advocated for adherence to the agreement that the Government of Uganda struck with China Eximbank in March 2019 (as codified in the ‘minutes of the meeting’).
However, UCAA and the Ministry of Public Works reportedly treated Kasaija’s position ‘with disdain for allegedly blind-spotting a deal that presents real risks to Uganda's sovereign assets.’ UCAA officials reportedly flagged up to 13 clauses in the China Eximbank agreement as "unfair” or a threat to “the sovereignty of Uganda.” A confidential source told the a local newspaper in Uganda that “it’s clear that [U]CAA will lose its rights of use and control over its revenues […] as a self-financing institution with limited funding.
Such provisions would expose the [organization] to risk of failure in service delivery and bankruptcy.” In June 2020, David Kakuba, who was the Director General of UCAA at that time, warned that granting China Eximbank approval authority over UCAA’s budgeting and planning decisions “exposes UCAA to risk of failure to deliver its mandate, and infringes on State's effective control over UCAA.” After Kakuba’s retirement, the Acting UCAA Director General Fred Bamwesigye wrote to Works Minister Gen Edward Katumba Wamala on September 8, 2021 and reminded him of the importance of renegotiating the loan agreement with China Eximbank.
He also asked him to remind Minister of Finance Matia Kasaija to notify China Eximbank of the need to amend the agreement to make it consistent with Ugandan law and international law.
He wrote that “whereas some of the provisions referred to were alluded to in the Minutes of the Negotiations, the unfair clauses remain embedded in the agreements, while in some cases, they were not dealt with at all. […] There is, therefore, an urgent need to start the review and renegotiation of the Government Concession Loan Agreement... in order to reduce the intentions of the parties into a legally-binding agreement.” Then, on December 11, 2019, David Kakuba warned Minister of Finance Matia Kasaija that “any seeming delay or any form of understanding that is not reduced into an amended agreement of the signed ones, would maintain the enforceability by [China Eximbank] of the disputed agreement.” He also noted that Section 10.3 of the Repayment Mechanism Agreement provides for a waiver of immunity and states that ‘each obligor hereby irrevocably waives any immunity on grounds of sovereign or other immunity for itself or any of its property in connection with any arbitration proceeding or with enforcement of any arbitral awards any court judgement.' Such a provision, if not amended, David Kakuba argues "exposes government assets to attachments and take-over upon arbitration awards in China.” Around the same time, Uganda’s Ministry of Public Works reportedly asked the Ministry of Finance to seek a speedy revision and resolution of the ‘problematic clauses’ in the China Eximbank loan agreement.
However, in December 2021, Bloomberg reported that “Uganda’s chief legal officer urged the Finance Ministry to refrain from renegotiating the terms of [the China Eximbank loan agreement] as it is able to meet its debt obligations.”
Government of Uganda
Complete our application form to express your interest and we'll guide you through the process.
Apply for This Grant